Temporal adventure
in a constant tempora venture, why must that of a spatial venture by so limited?
differences between the modes are that we can easily observe a warp in our perception of space. But we cannot control our perception or position in time nearly as affectively. What benefit can we get from observing and applying the constant churn of time to our freedom in space.
for what reason could we not traverse a meter in the same way we traverse a second? In a practical situation this venture collides with logistics. However this is merely because the modern car and consmer allow the treating of a mile as less than that of a minute and the convienience of purchase as the click of a finger.
But to what point do we extinguish the use of technologies to traverse through space?
simply it seems we should ponder the expense of the technology. Public transportation is but a small fare with exceptions. a car is consists of petrol and insurance while creating more risk of travel but also being adequette portable shelter. Feet or a bicycle only expend whysical exertion while taking more time and requiring more food.
But what is your mode but a scale of transit and a philosophy of the journey?
what ties your responsibilties to a physical place? and how can these be abdicated for the temporary adventure. How can the expense of travel be minimised to allow for easier logistics. And how can we make adventure more prominent in our daily lives?
if a meter is but seconds then can we treat klometers but fractions of an hour?
Or perhaps it is the logistics that restrain us from a mere 100km between us and a bustling metropolis of oportunitty?